Information on Result #3030073
There is no (113, 208, 291)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (113, 207, 291)-net in base 2, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(2207, 291, S2, 94), but
- 8 times code embedding in larger space [i] would yield OA(2215, 299, S2, 94), but
- adding a parity check bit [i] would yield OA(2216, 300, S2, 95), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 872407 680551 113098 866799 953294 886066 311827 924058 628412 428016 149220 115296 187426 023936 653562 740736 / 5 938078 052347 021578 779474 608305 > 2216 [i]
- adding a parity check bit [i] would yield OA(2216, 300, S2, 95), but
- 8 times code embedding in larger space [i] would yield OA(2215, 299, S2, 94), but
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.