Information on Result #3033539
There is no (161, 202, 8775)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (161, 201, 8775)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3 220512 463865 397168 030304 362390 757318 906651 924143 780888 834196 > 2201 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.