Information on Result #3038596
There is no (8, 17, 87)-net in base 3, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (8, 16, 87)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 44 609657 > 316 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.