Information on Result #3105261
There is no (6, 21, 222)-net in base 9, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (6, 20, 222)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 12 473345 568215 470545 > 920 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.