Information on Result #3106220
There is no (16, 29, 10621)-net in base 9, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (16, 28, 10621)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 523 596858 902988 687561 104049 > 928 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.