Information on Result #3106238
There is no (16, 65, 416)-net in base 9, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (16, 64, 416)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 12 397180 482203 850088 197519 718469 717132 091339 702158 067724 863489 > 964 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.