Information on Result #3109304
There is no (65, 130, 11216)-net in base 9, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (65, 129, 11216)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 1252 138600 637703 866836 278763 109604 607759 439897 172028 539066 033312 902843 965683 512875 941004 423413 573506 948249 095421 820340 809729 > 9129 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.