Information on Result #3132592
There is no (16, 41, 88023)-net in base 64, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (16, 40, 88023)-net in base 64, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 1 767016 155422 088411 832436 258764 377435 151780 127330 764904 909452 325607 241438 > 6440 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.