Information on Result #3132814
There is no (21, 72, 21757)-net in base 64, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (21, 71, 21757)-net in base 64, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 173 391279 490502 724434 517385 771464 959833 300252 023517 236355 164006 781743 055067 080616 126756 508936 733711 689605 014292 069785 743015 022924 > 6471 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.