Information on Result #3142554
There is no digital (94, 183, 208)-net over F2, because 5 times m-reduction would yield digital (94, 178, 208)-net over F2, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(2178, 208, F2, 84) (dual of [208, 30, 85]-code), but
- 1 times code embedding in larger space [i] would yield linear OA(2179, 209, F2, 84) (dual of [209, 30, 85]-code), but
- adding a parity check bit [i] would yield linear OA(2180, 210, F2, 85) (dual of [210, 30, 86]-code), but
- 1 times code embedding in larger space [i] would yield linear OA(2179, 209, F2, 84) (dual of [209, 30, 85]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.