Information on Result #464067
There is no (116, 118, large)-net in base 2, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (116, 119, large)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
| 2 | No (116, 120, large)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 3 | No (116, 121, large)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 4 | No (116, 122, large)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 5 | No (116, 123, large)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 6 | No (116, 124, large)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 7 | No (116, 125, large)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 8 | No (116, 126, large)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 9 | No (116, 127, large)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||