Information on Result #464080
There is no (129, 131, large)-net in base 2, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (129, 132, large)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
| 2 | No (129, 133, large)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 3 | No (129, 134, large)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 4 | No (129, 135, large)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 5 | No (129, 136, large)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 6 | No (129, 137, large)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 7 | No (129, 138, large)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 8 | No (129, 139, large)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 9 | No (129, 140, large)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 10 | No (129, 141, large)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 11 | No (129, 142, large)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||