Information on Result #464123

There is no (172, 174, large)-net in base 2, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (172, 175, large)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction
2No (172, 176, large)-net in base 2 [i]
3No (172, 177, large)-net in base 2 [i]
4No (172, 178, large)-net in base 2 [i]
5No (172, 179, large)-net in base 2 [i]
6No (172, 180, large)-net in base 2 [i]
7No (172, 181, large)-net in base 2 [i]
8No (172, 182, large)-net in base 2 [i]
9No (172, 183, large)-net in base 2 [i]
10No (172, 184, large)-net in base 2 [i]
11No (172, 185, large)-net in base 2 [i]
12No (172, 186, large)-net in base 2 [i]
13No (172, 187, large)-net in base 2 [i]
14No (172, 188, large)-net in base 2 [i]
15No (172, 189, large)-net in base 2 [i]
16No (172, 190, large)-net in base 2 [i]
17No (172, 191, large)-net in base 2 [i]