Information on Result #464141

There is no (190, 192, large)-net in base 2, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (190, 193, large)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction
2No (190, 194, large)-net in base 2 [i]
3No (190, 195, large)-net in base 2 [i]
4No (190, 196, large)-net in base 2 [i]
5No (190, 197, large)-net in base 2 [i]
6No (190, 198, large)-net in base 2 [i]
7No (190, 199, large)-net in base 2 [i]
8No (190, 200, large)-net in base 2 [i]
9No (190, 201, large)-net in base 2 [i]
10No (190, 202, large)-net in base 2 [i]
11No (190, 203, large)-net in base 2 [i]
12No (190, 204, large)-net in base 2 [i]
13No (190, 205, large)-net in base 2 [i]
14No (190, 206, large)-net in base 2 [i]
15No (190, 207, large)-net in base 2 [i]
16No (190, 208, large)-net in base 2 [i]
17No (190, 209, large)-net in base 2 [i]
18No (190, 210, large)-net in base 2 [i]
19No (190, 211, large)-net in base 2 [i]