Information on Result #464159

There is no (208, 210, large)-net in base 2, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (208, 211, large)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction
2No (208, 212, large)-net in base 2 [i]
3No (208, 213, large)-net in base 2 [i]
4No (208, 214, large)-net in base 2 [i]
5No (208, 215, large)-net in base 2 [i]
6No (208, 216, large)-net in base 2 [i]
7No (208, 217, large)-net in base 2 [i]
8No (208, 218, large)-net in base 2 [i]
9No (208, 219, large)-net in base 2 [i]
10No (208, 220, large)-net in base 2 [i]
11No (208, 221, large)-net in base 2 [i]
12No (208, 222, large)-net in base 2 [i]
13No (208, 223, large)-net in base 2 [i]
14No (208, 224, large)-net in base 2 [i]
15No (208, 225, large)-net in base 2 [i]
16No (208, 226, large)-net in base 2 [i]
17No (208, 227, large)-net in base 2 [i]
18No (208, 228, large)-net in base 2 [i]
19No (208, 229, large)-net in base 2 [i]
20No (208, 230, large)-net in base 2 [i]
21No (208, 231, large)-net in base 2 [i]