Information on Result #464169

There is no (218, 220, large)-net in base 2, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (218, 221, large)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction
2No (218, 222, large)-net in base 2 [i]
3No (218, 223, large)-net in base 2 [i]
4No (218, 224, large)-net in base 2 [i]
5No (218, 225, large)-net in base 2 [i]
6No (218, 226, large)-net in base 2 [i]
7No (218, 227, large)-net in base 2 [i]
8No (218, 228, large)-net in base 2 [i]
9No (218, 229, large)-net in base 2 [i]
10No (218, 230, large)-net in base 2 [i]
11No (218, 231, large)-net in base 2 [i]
12No (218, 232, large)-net in base 2 [i]
13No (218, 233, large)-net in base 2 [i]
14No (218, 234, large)-net in base 2 [i]
15No (218, 235, large)-net in base 2 [i]
16No (218, 236, large)-net in base 2 [i]
17No (218, 237, large)-net in base 2 [i]
18No (218, 238, large)-net in base 2 [i]
19No (218, 239, large)-net in base 2 [i]
20No (218, 240, large)-net in base 2 [i]
21No (218, 241, large)-net in base 2 [i]