Information on Result #464171

There is no (220, 222, large)-net in base 2, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (220, 223, large)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction
2No (220, 224, large)-net in base 2 [i]
3No (220, 225, large)-net in base 2 [i]
4No (220, 226, large)-net in base 2 [i]
5No (220, 227, large)-net in base 2 [i]
6No (220, 228, large)-net in base 2 [i]
7No (220, 229, large)-net in base 2 [i]
8No (220, 230, large)-net in base 2 [i]
9No (220, 231, large)-net in base 2 [i]
10No (220, 232, large)-net in base 2 [i]
11No (220, 233, large)-net in base 2 [i]
12No (220, 234, large)-net in base 2 [i]
13No (220, 235, large)-net in base 2 [i]
14No (220, 236, large)-net in base 2 [i]
15No (220, 237, large)-net in base 2 [i]
16No (220, 238, large)-net in base 2 [i]
17No (220, 239, large)-net in base 2 [i]
18No (220, 240, large)-net in base 2 [i]
19No (220, 241, large)-net in base 2 [i]
20No (220, 242, large)-net in base 2 [i]
21No (220, 243, large)-net in base 2 [i]