Information on Result #464336

There is no (126, 128, large)-net in base 3, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (126, 129, large)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction
2No (126, 130, large)-net in base 3 [i]
3No (126, 131, large)-net in base 3 [i]
4No (126, 132, large)-net in base 3 [i]
5No (126, 133, large)-net in base 3 [i]
6No (126, 134, large)-net in base 3 [i]
7No (126, 135, large)-net in base 3 [i]
8No (126, 136, large)-net in base 3 [i]
9No (126, 137, large)-net in base 3 [i]
10No (126, 138, large)-net in base 3 [i]
11No (126, 139, large)-net in base 3 [i]
12No (126, 140, large)-net in base 3 [i]
13No (126, 141, large)-net in base 3 [i]
14No (126, 142, large)-net in base 3 [i]
15No (126, 143, large)-net in base 3 [i]
16No (126, 144, large)-net in base 3 [i]
17No (126, 145, large)-net in base 3 [i]
18No (126, 146, large)-net in base 3 [i]
19No (126, 147, large)-net in base 3 [i]