Information on Result #464349

There is no (139, 141, large)-net in base 3, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (139, 142, large)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction
2No (139, 143, large)-net in base 3 [i]
3No (139, 144, large)-net in base 3 [i]
4No (139, 145, large)-net in base 3 [i]
5No (139, 146, large)-net in base 3 [i]
6No (139, 147, large)-net in base 3 [i]
7No (139, 148, large)-net in base 3 [i]
8No (139, 149, large)-net in base 3 [i]
9No (139, 150, large)-net in base 3 [i]
10No (139, 151, large)-net in base 3 [i]
11No (139, 152, large)-net in base 3 [i]
12No (139, 153, large)-net in base 3 [i]
13No (139, 154, large)-net in base 3 [i]
14No (139, 155, large)-net in base 3 [i]
15No (139, 156, large)-net in base 3 [i]
16No (139, 157, large)-net in base 3 [i]
17No (139, 158, large)-net in base 3 [i]
18No (139, 159, large)-net in base 3 [i]
19No (139, 160, large)-net in base 3 [i]
20No (139, 161, large)-net in base 3 [i]
21No (139, 162, large)-net in base 3 [i]