Information on Result #464807

There is no (89, 91, large)-net in base 5, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (89, 92, large)-net in base 5 [i]m-Reduction
2No (89, 93, large)-net in base 5 [i]
3No (89, 94, large)-net in base 5 [i]
4No (89, 95, large)-net in base 5 [i]
5No (89, 96, large)-net in base 5 [i]
6No (89, 97, large)-net in base 5 [i]
7No (89, 98, large)-net in base 5 [i]
8No (89, 99, large)-net in base 5 [i]
9No (89, 100, large)-net in base 5 [i]
10No (89, 101, large)-net in base 5 [i]
11No (89, 102, large)-net in base 5 [i]
12No (89, 103, large)-net in base 5 [i]
13No (89, 104, large)-net in base 5 [i]
14No (89, 105, large)-net in base 5 [i]
15No (89, 106, large)-net in base 5 [i]
16No (89, 107, large)-net in base 5 [i]
17No (89, 108, large)-net in base 5 [i]
18No (89, 109, large)-net in base 5 [i]
19No (89, 110, large)-net in base 5 [i]
20No (89, 111, large)-net in base 5 [i]
21No (89, 112, large)-net in base 5 [i]