Information on Result #464814

There is no (96, 98, large)-net in base 5, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (96, 99, large)-net in base 5 [i]m-Reduction
2No (96, 100, large)-net in base 5 [i]
3No (96, 101, large)-net in base 5 [i]
4No (96, 102, large)-net in base 5 [i]
5No (96, 103, large)-net in base 5 [i]
6No (96, 104, large)-net in base 5 [i]
7No (96, 105, large)-net in base 5 [i]
8No (96, 106, large)-net in base 5 [i]
9No (96, 107, large)-net in base 5 [i]
10No (96, 108, large)-net in base 5 [i]
11No (96, 109, large)-net in base 5 [i]
12No (96, 110, large)-net in base 5 [i]
13No (96, 111, large)-net in base 5 [i]
14No (96, 112, large)-net in base 5 [i]
15No (96, 113, large)-net in base 5 [i]
16No (96, 114, large)-net in base 5 [i]
17No (96, 115, large)-net in base 5 [i]
18No (96, 116, large)-net in base 5 [i]
19No (96, 117, large)-net in base 5 [i]
20No (96, 118, large)-net in base 5 [i]
21No (96, 119, large)-net in base 5 [i]
22No (96, 120, large)-net in base 5 [i]
23No (96, 121, large)-net in base 5 [i]