Information on Result #464822

There is no (104, 106, large)-net in base 5, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (104, 107, large)-net in base 5 [i]m-Reduction
2No (104, 108, large)-net in base 5 [i]
3No (104, 109, large)-net in base 5 [i]
4No (104, 110, large)-net in base 5 [i]
5No (104, 111, large)-net in base 5 [i]
6No (104, 112, large)-net in base 5 [i]
7No (104, 113, large)-net in base 5 [i]
8No (104, 114, large)-net in base 5 [i]
9No (104, 115, large)-net in base 5 [i]
10No (104, 116, large)-net in base 5 [i]
11No (104, 117, large)-net in base 5 [i]
12No (104, 118, large)-net in base 5 [i]
13No (104, 119, large)-net in base 5 [i]
14No (104, 120, large)-net in base 5 [i]
15No (104, 121, large)-net in base 5 [i]
16No (104, 122, large)-net in base 5 [i]
17No (104, 123, large)-net in base 5 [i]
18No (104, 124, large)-net in base 5 [i]
19No (104, 125, large)-net in base 5 [i]
20No (104, 126, large)-net in base 5 [i]
21No (104, 127, large)-net in base 5 [i]
22No (104, 128, large)-net in base 5 [i]
23No (104, 129, large)-net in base 5 [i]
24No (104, 130, large)-net in base 5 [i]
25No (104, 131, large)-net in base 5 [i]