Information on Result #465136
There is no (160, 162, large)-net in base 8, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (160, 163, large)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
| 2 | No (160, 164, large)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 3 | No (160, 165, large)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 4 | No (160, 166, large)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 5 | No (160, 167, large)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 6 | No (160, 168, large)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 7 | No (160, 169, large)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 8 | No (160, 170, large)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 9 | No (160, 171, large)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 10 | No (160, 172, large)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 11 | No (160, 173, large)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||