Information on Result #465137
There is no (161, 163, large)-net in base 8, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (161, 164, large)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
| 2 | No (161, 165, large)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 3 | No (161, 166, large)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 4 | No (161, 167, large)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 5 | No (161, 168, large)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 6 | No (161, 169, large)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 7 | No (161, 170, large)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 8 | No (161, 171, large)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 9 | No (161, 172, large)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 10 | No (161, 173, large)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||