Information on Result #465180
There is no (32, 34, large)-net in base 9, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (32, 35, large)-net in base 9 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
| 2 | No (32, 36, large)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 3 | No (32, 37, large)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 4 | No (32, 38, large)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 5 | No (32, 39, large)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 6 | No (32, 40, large)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 7 | No (32, 41, large)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 8 | No (32, 42, large)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 9 | No (32, 43, large)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||