Information on Result #465189
There is no (41, 43, large)-net in base 9, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (41, 44, large)-net in base 9 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
2 | No (41, 45, large)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
3 | No (41, 46, large)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
4 | No (41, 47, large)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
5 | No (41, 48, large)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
6 | No (41, 49, large)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
7 | No (41, 50, large)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
8 | No (41, 51, large)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
9 | No (41, 52, large)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
10 | No (41, 53, large)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
11 | No (41, 54, large)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
12 | No (41, 55, large)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
13 | No (41, 56, large)-net in base 9 | [i] |