Information on Result #465206

There is no (58, 60, large)-net in base 9, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (58, 61, large)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction
2No (58, 62, large)-net in base 9 [i]
3No (58, 63, large)-net in base 9 [i]
4No (58, 64, large)-net in base 9 [i]
5No (58, 65, large)-net in base 9 [i]
6No (58, 66, large)-net in base 9 [i]
7No (58, 67, large)-net in base 9 [i]
8No (58, 68, large)-net in base 9 [i]
9No (58, 69, large)-net in base 9 [i]
10No (58, 70, large)-net in base 9 [i]
11No (58, 71, large)-net in base 9 [i]
12No (58, 72, large)-net in base 9 [i]
13No (58, 73, large)-net in base 9 [i]
14No (58, 74, large)-net in base 9 [i]
15No (58, 75, large)-net in base 9 [i]
16No (58, 76, large)-net in base 9 [i]
17No (58, 77, large)-net in base 9 [i]
18No (58, 78, large)-net in base 9 [i]
19No (58, 79, large)-net in base 9 [i]