Information on Result #465216

There is no (68, 70, large)-net in base 9, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (68, 71, large)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction
2No (68, 72, large)-net in base 9 [i]
3No (68, 73, large)-net in base 9 [i]
4No (68, 74, large)-net in base 9 [i]
5No (68, 75, large)-net in base 9 [i]
6No (68, 76, large)-net in base 9 [i]
7No (68, 77, large)-net in base 9 [i]
8No (68, 78, large)-net in base 9 [i]
9No (68, 79, large)-net in base 9 [i]
10No (68, 80, large)-net in base 9 [i]
11No (68, 81, large)-net in base 9 [i]
12No (68, 82, large)-net in base 9 [i]
13No (68, 83, large)-net in base 9 [i]
14No (68, 84, large)-net in base 9 [i]
15No (68, 85, large)-net in base 9 [i]
16No (68, 86, large)-net in base 9 [i]
17No (68, 87, large)-net in base 9 [i]
18No (68, 88, large)-net in base 9 [i]
19No (68, 89, large)-net in base 9 [i]
20No (68, 90, large)-net in base 9 [i]
21No (68, 91, large)-net in base 9 [i]
22No (68, 92, large)-net in base 9 [i]
23No (68, 93, large)-net in base 9 [i]