Information on Result #465271

There is no (123, 125, large)-net in base 9, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (123, 126, large)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction
2No (123, 127, large)-net in base 9 [i]
3No (123, 128, large)-net in base 9 [i]
4No (123, 129, large)-net in base 9 [i]
5No (123, 130, large)-net in base 9 [i]
6No (123, 131, large)-net in base 9 [i]
7No (123, 132, large)-net in base 9 [i]
8No (123, 133, large)-net in base 9 [i]
9No (123, 134, large)-net in base 9 [i]
10No (123, 135, large)-net in base 9 [i]
11No (123, 136, large)-net in base 9 [i]
12No (123, 137, large)-net in base 9 [i]
13No (123, 138, large)-net in base 9 [i]
14No (123, 139, large)-net in base 9 [i]
15No (123, 140, large)-net in base 9 [i]
16No (123, 141, large)-net in base 9 [i]
17No (123, 142, large)-net in base 9 [i]
18No (123, 143, large)-net in base 9 [i]
19No (123, 144, large)-net in base 9 [i]
20No (123, 145, large)-net in base 9 [i]
21No (123, 146, large)-net in base 9 [i]
22No (123, 147, large)-net in base 9 [i]
23No (123, 148, large)-net in base 9 [i]
24No (123, 149, large)-net in base 9 [i]
25No (123, 150, large)-net in base 9 [i]