Information on Result #465272

There is no (124, 126, large)-net in base 9, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (124, 127, large)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction
2No (124, 128, large)-net in base 9 [i]
3No (124, 129, large)-net in base 9 [i]
4No (124, 130, large)-net in base 9 [i]
5No (124, 131, large)-net in base 9 [i]
6No (124, 132, large)-net in base 9 [i]
7No (124, 133, large)-net in base 9 [i]
8No (124, 134, large)-net in base 9 [i]
9No (124, 135, large)-net in base 9 [i]
10No (124, 136, large)-net in base 9 [i]
11No (124, 137, large)-net in base 9 [i]
12No (124, 138, large)-net in base 9 [i]
13No (124, 139, large)-net in base 9 [i]
14No (124, 140, large)-net in base 9 [i]
15No (124, 141, large)-net in base 9 [i]
16No (124, 142, large)-net in base 9 [i]
17No (124, 143, large)-net in base 9 [i]
18No (124, 144, large)-net in base 9 [i]
19No (124, 145, large)-net in base 9 [i]
20No (124, 146, large)-net in base 9 [i]
21No (124, 147, large)-net in base 9 [i]
22No (124, 148, large)-net in base 9 [i]
23No (124, 149, large)-net in base 9 [i]
24No (124, 150, large)-net in base 9 [i]