Information on Result #465343

There is no (46, 48, large)-net in base 16, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (46, 49, large)-net in base 16 [i]m-Reduction
2No (46, 50, large)-net in base 16 [i]
3No (46, 51, large)-net in base 16 [i]
4No (46, 52, large)-net in base 16 [i]
5No (46, 53, large)-net in base 16 [i]
6No (46, 54, large)-net in base 16 [i]
7No (46, 55, large)-net in base 16 [i]
8No (46, 56, large)-net in base 16 [i]
9No (46, 57, large)-net in base 16 [i]
10No (46, 58, large)-net in base 16 [i]
11No (46, 59, large)-net in base 16 [i]
12No (46, 60, large)-net in base 16 [i]
13No (46, 61, large)-net in base 16 [i]
14No (46, 62, large)-net in base 16 [i]
15No (46, 63, large)-net in base 16 [i]
16No (46, 64, large)-net in base 16 [i]
17No (46, 65, large)-net in base 16 [i]
18No (46, 66, large)-net in base 16 [i]
19No (46, 67, large)-net in base 16 [i]
20No (46, 68, large)-net in base 16 [i]
21No (46, 69, large)-net in base 16 [i]