Information on Result #465397

There is no (100, 102, large)-net in base 16, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (100, 103, large)-net in base 16 [i]m-Reduction
2No (100, 104, large)-net in base 16 [i]
3No (100, 105, large)-net in base 16 [i]
4No (100, 106, large)-net in base 16 [i]
5No (100, 107, large)-net in base 16 [i]
6No (100, 108, large)-net in base 16 [i]
7No (100, 109, large)-net in base 16 [i]
8No (100, 110, large)-net in base 16 [i]
9No (100, 111, large)-net in base 16 [i]
10No (100, 112, large)-net in base 16 [i]
11No (100, 113, large)-net in base 16 [i]
12No (100, 114, large)-net in base 16 [i]
13No (100, 115, large)-net in base 16 [i]
14No (100, 116, large)-net in base 16 [i]
15No (100, 117, large)-net in base 16 [i]
16No (100, 118, large)-net in base 16 [i]
17No (100, 119, large)-net in base 16 [i]
18No (100, 120, large)-net in base 16 [i]
19No (100, 121, large)-net in base 16 [i]
20No (100, 122, large)-net in base 16 [i]
21No (100, 123, large)-net in base 16 [i]
22No (100, 124, large)-net in base 16 [i]
23No (100, 125, large)-net in base 16 [i]
24No (100, 126, large)-net in base 16 [i]
25No (100, 127, large)-net in base 16 [i]
26No (100, 128, large)-net in base 16 [i]
27No (100, 129, large)-net in base 16 [i]
28No (100, 130, large)-net in base 16 [i]