Information on Result #465406

There is no (109, 111, large)-net in base 16, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (109, 112, large)-net in base 16 [i]m-Reduction
2No (109, 113, large)-net in base 16 [i]
3No (109, 114, large)-net in base 16 [i]
4No (109, 115, large)-net in base 16 [i]
5No (109, 116, large)-net in base 16 [i]
6No (109, 117, large)-net in base 16 [i]
7No (109, 118, large)-net in base 16 [i]
8No (109, 119, large)-net in base 16 [i]
9No (109, 120, large)-net in base 16 [i]
10No (109, 121, large)-net in base 16 [i]
11No (109, 122, large)-net in base 16 [i]
12No (109, 123, large)-net in base 16 [i]
13No (109, 124, large)-net in base 16 [i]
14No (109, 125, large)-net in base 16 [i]
15No (109, 126, large)-net in base 16 [i]
16No (109, 127, large)-net in base 16 [i]
17No (109, 128, large)-net in base 16 [i]
18No (109, 129, large)-net in base 16 [i]
19No (109, 130, large)-net in base 16 [i]