Information on Result #465571

There is no (36, 38, large)-net in base 27, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (36, 39, large)-net in base 27 [i]m-Reduction
2No (36, 40, large)-net in base 27 [i]
3No (36, 41, large)-net in base 27 [i]
4No (36, 42, large)-net in base 27 [i]
5No (36, 43, large)-net in base 27 [i]
6No (36, 44, large)-net in base 27 [i]
7No (36, 45, large)-net in base 27 [i]
8No (36, 46, large)-net in base 27 [i]
9No (36, 47, large)-net in base 27 [i]
10No (36, 48, large)-net in base 27 [i]
11No (36, 49, large)-net in base 27 [i]
12No (36, 50, large)-net in base 27 [i]
13No (36, 51, large)-net in base 27 [i]
14No (36, 52, large)-net in base 27 [i]
15No (36, 53, large)-net in base 27 [i]
16No (36, 54, large)-net in base 27 [i]
17No (36, 55, large)-net in base 27 [i]
18No (36, 56, large)-net in base 27 [i]
19No (36, 57, large)-net in base 27 [i]