Information on Result #465626

There is no (91, 93, large)-net in base 27, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (91, 94, large)-net in base 27 [i]m-Reduction
2No (91, 95, large)-net in base 27 [i]
3No (91, 96, large)-net in base 27 [i]
4No (91, 97, large)-net in base 27 [i]
5No (91, 98, large)-net in base 27 [i]
6No (91, 99, large)-net in base 27 [i]
7No (91, 100, large)-net in base 27 [i]
8No (91, 101, large)-net in base 27 [i]
9No (91, 102, large)-net in base 27 [i]
10No (91, 103, large)-net in base 27 [i]
11No (91, 104, large)-net in base 27 [i]
12No (91, 105, large)-net in base 27 [i]
13No (91, 106, large)-net in base 27 [i]
14No (91, 107, large)-net in base 27 [i]
15No (91, 108, large)-net in base 27 [i]
16No (91, 109, large)-net in base 27 [i]
17No (91, 110, large)-net in base 27 [i]