Information on Result #465631
There is no (96, 98, large)-net in base 27, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (96, 99, large)-net in base 27 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
| 2 | No (96, 100, large)-net in base 27 | [i] | ||
| 3 | No (96, 101, large)-net in base 27 | [i] | ||
| 4 | No (96, 102, large)-net in base 27 | [i] | ||
| 5 | No (96, 103, large)-net in base 27 | [i] | ||
| 6 | No (96, 104, large)-net in base 27 | [i] | ||
| 7 | No (96, 105, large)-net in base 27 | [i] | ||
| 8 | No (96, 106, large)-net in base 27 | [i] | ||
| 9 | No (96, 107, large)-net in base 27 | [i] | ||
| 10 | No (96, 108, large)-net in base 27 | [i] | ||
| 11 | No (96, 109, large)-net in base 27 | [i] | ||
| 12 | No (96, 110, large)-net in base 27 | [i] | ||