Information on Result #465738
There is no (94, 96, large)-net in base 32, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (94, 97, large)-net in base 32 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
| 2 | No (94, 98, large)-net in base 32 | [i] | ||
| 3 | No (94, 99, large)-net in base 32 | [i] | ||
| 4 | No (94, 100, large)-net in base 32 | [i] | ||
| 5 | No (94, 101, large)-net in base 32 | [i] | ||
| 6 | No (94, 102, large)-net in base 32 | [i] | ||
| 7 | No (94, 103, large)-net in base 32 | [i] | ||
| 8 | No (94, 104, large)-net in base 32 | [i] | ||
| 9 | No (94, 105, large)-net in base 32 | [i] | ||
| 10 | No (94, 106, large)-net in base 32 | [i] | ||
| 11 | No (94, 107, large)-net in base 32 | [i] | ||
| 12 | No (94, 108, large)-net in base 32 | [i] | ||
| 13 | No (94, 109, large)-net in base 32 | [i] | ||
| 14 | No (94, 110, large)-net in base 32 | [i] | ||