Information on Result #465783

There is no (30, 32, large)-net in base 49, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (30, 33, large)-net in base 49 [i]m-Reduction
2No (30, 34, large)-net in base 49 [i]
3No (30, 35, large)-net in base 49 [i]
4No (30, 36, large)-net in base 49 [i]
5No (30, 37, large)-net in base 49 [i]
6No (30, 38, large)-net in base 49 [i]
7No (30, 39, large)-net in base 49 [i]
8No (30, 40, large)-net in base 49 [i]
9No (30, 41, large)-net in base 49 [i]
10No (30, 42, large)-net in base 49 [i]
11No (30, 43, large)-net in base 49 [i]
12No (30, 44, large)-net in base 49 [i]
13No (30, 45, large)-net in base 49 [i]
14No (30, 46, large)-net in base 49 [i]
15No (30, 47, large)-net in base 49 [i]
16No (30, 48, large)-net in base 49 [i]
17No (30, 49, large)-net in base 49 [i]
18No (30, 50, large)-net in base 49 [i]
19No (30, 51, large)-net in base 49 [i]
20No (30, 52, large)-net in base 49 [i]
21No (30, 53, large)-net in base 49 [i]