Information on Result #465784

There is no (31, 33, large)-net in base 49, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (31, 34, large)-net in base 49 [i]m-Reduction
2No (31, 35, large)-net in base 49 [i]
3No (31, 36, large)-net in base 49 [i]
4No (31, 37, large)-net in base 49 [i]
5No (31, 38, large)-net in base 49 [i]
6No (31, 39, large)-net in base 49 [i]
7No (31, 40, large)-net in base 49 [i]
8No (31, 41, large)-net in base 49 [i]
9No (31, 42, large)-net in base 49 [i]
10No (31, 43, large)-net in base 49 [i]
11No (31, 44, large)-net in base 49 [i]
12No (31, 45, large)-net in base 49 [i]
13No (31, 46, large)-net in base 49 [i]
14No (31, 47, large)-net in base 49 [i]
15No (31, 48, large)-net in base 49 [i]
16No (31, 49, large)-net in base 49 [i]
17No (31, 50, large)-net in base 49 [i]
18No (31, 51, large)-net in base 49 [i]
19No (31, 52, large)-net in base 49 [i]
20No (31, 53, large)-net in base 49 [i]
21No (31, 54, large)-net in base 49 [i]