Information on Result #465840

There is no (33, 35, large)-net in base 64, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (33, 36, large)-net in base 64 [i]m-Reduction
2No (33, 37, large)-net in base 64 [i]
3No (33, 38, large)-net in base 64 [i]
4No (33, 39, large)-net in base 64 [i]
5No (33, 40, large)-net in base 64 [i]
6No (33, 41, large)-net in base 64 [i]
7No (33, 42, large)-net in base 64 [i]
8No (33, 43, large)-net in base 64 [i]
9No (33, 44, large)-net in base 64 [i]
10No (33, 45, large)-net in base 64 [i]
11No (33, 46, large)-net in base 64 [i]
12No (33, 47, large)-net in base 64 [i]
13No (33, 48, large)-net in base 64 [i]
14No (33, 49, large)-net in base 64 [i]
15No (33, 50, large)-net in base 64 [i]
16No (33, 51, large)-net in base 64 [i]
17No (33, 52, large)-net in base 64 [i]
18No (33, 53, large)-net in base 64 [i]
19No (33, 54, large)-net in base 64 [i]
20No (33, 55, large)-net in base 64 [i]
21No (33, 56, large)-net in base 64 [i]
22No (33, 57, large)-net in base 64 [i]
23No (33, 58, large)-net in base 64 [i]
24No (33, 59, large)-net in base 64 [i]
25No (33, 60, large)-net in base 64 [i]