Information on Result #466071

There is no (16, 18, large)-net in base 256, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (16, 19, large)-net in base 256 [i]m-Reduction
2No (16, 20, large)-net in base 256 [i]
3No (16, 21, large)-net in base 256 [i]
4No (16, 22, large)-net in base 256 [i]
5No (16, 23, large)-net in base 256 [i]
6No (16, 24, large)-net in base 256 [i]
7No (16, 25, large)-net in base 256 [i]
8No (16, 26, large)-net in base 256 [i]
9No (16, 27, large)-net in base 256 [i]
10No (16, 28, large)-net in base 256 [i]
11No (16, 29, large)-net in base 256 [i]
12No (16, 30, large)-net in base 256 [i]
13No (16, 31, large)-net in base 256 [i]
14No (16, 32, large)-net in base 256 [i]
15No (16, 33, large)-net in base 256 [i]
16No (16, 34, large)-net in base 256 [i]
17No (16, 35, large)-net in base 256 [i]