Information on Result #466076

There is no (21, 23, large)-net in base 256, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (21, 24, large)-net in base 256 [i]m-Reduction
2No (21, 25, large)-net in base 256 [i]
3No (21, 26, large)-net in base 256 [i]
4No (21, 27, large)-net in base 256 [i]
5No (21, 28, large)-net in base 256 [i]
6No (21, 29, large)-net in base 256 [i]
7No (21, 30, large)-net in base 256 [i]
8No (21, 31, large)-net in base 256 [i]
9No (21, 32, large)-net in base 256 [i]
10No (21, 33, large)-net in base 256 [i]
11No (21, 34, large)-net in base 256 [i]
12No (21, 35, large)-net in base 256 [i]
13No (21, 36, large)-net in base 256 [i]
14No (21, 37, large)-net in base 256 [i]
15No (21, 38, large)-net in base 256 [i]
16No (21, 39, large)-net in base 256 [i]
17No (21, 40, large)-net in base 256 [i]
18No (21, 41, large)-net in base 256 [i]
19No (21, 42, large)-net in base 256 [i]
20No (21, 43, large)-net in base 256 [i]
21No (21, 44, large)-net in base 256 [i]
22No (21, 45, large)-net in base 256 [i]
23No (21, 46, large)-net in base 256 [i]
24No (21, 47, large)-net in base 256 [i]
25No (21, 48, large)-net in base 256 [i]