Information on Result #466099

There is no (44, 46, large)-net in base 256, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (44, 47, large)-net in base 256 [i]m-Reduction
2No (44, 48, large)-net in base 256 [i]
3No (44, 49, large)-net in base 256 [i]
4No (44, 50, large)-net in base 256 [i]
5No (44, 51, large)-net in base 256 [i]
6No (44, 52, large)-net in base 256 [i]
7No (44, 53, large)-net in base 256 [i]
8No (44, 54, large)-net in base 256 [i]
9No (44, 55, large)-net in base 256 [i]
10No (44, 56, large)-net in base 256 [i]
11No (44, 57, large)-net in base 256 [i]
12No (44, 58, large)-net in base 256 [i]
13No (44, 59, large)-net in base 256 [i]
14No (44, 60, large)-net in base 256 [i]
15No (44, 61, large)-net in base 256 [i]
16No (44, 62, large)-net in base 256 [i]
17No (44, 63, large)-net in base 256 [i]
18No (44, 64, large)-net in base 256 [i]
19No (44, 65, large)-net in base 256 [i]
20No (44, 66, large)-net in base 256 [i]
21No (44, 67, large)-net in base 256 [i]
22No (44, 68, large)-net in base 256 [i]