Information on Result #466631

There is no (22, 54, 51)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 22311 613216 406231 > 254

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (22, 55, 51)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction