Information on Result #466898

There is no (29, 67, 67)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 156 671816 140713 462184 > 267

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (29, 68, 67)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction