Information on Result #466947
There is no (39, 69, 136)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 644 893210 740430 847408 > 269
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (39, 70, 136)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction |