Information on Result #466947

There is no (39, 69, 136)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 644 893210 740430 847408 > 269

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (39, 70, 136)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction