Information on Result #467449

There is no (54, 88, 236)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 317 998891 475341 429660 299302 > 288

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (54, 89, 236)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction