Information on Result #467585

There is no (33, 93, 66)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 10113 016532 172814 400770 317920 > 293

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (33, 94, 66)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction