Information on Result #467646

There is no (33, 95, 66)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 47080 777409 291224 074461 256800 > 295

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (33, 96, 66)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction