Information on Result #467680

There is no (40, 96, 86)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 86613 886371 032851 881309 298680 > 296

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (40, 97, 86)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction